![]() The objective lens came loose in the housing after 5 shots. My Minox ZA5 3-15X50 came apart while sighting it in. ![]() Most of all, the Conquest is proven while the Minox scopes have suffered from frequent mechanical failures. The Minox has better contrast on darker objects in low light and the rectical is visible longer than the conquest.Īnd in the same comparisons, the Minox suffered from significant flaring while the Conquest didn't, and the Minox was only clear in the center of the lens, and lost resolution towards the edges, while the Conquest didn't. Plus Minox has a life time no fault warranty, if your gun falls out of your truck while your doing 100kph, at least you get a new scope, no questions asked.ĭo a web search on comparisons between the two. I would HIGHLY suggest the OP do the same and try them side by side, the clutter in the rapid z is way more than I want in a hunting scope. There is no way I'd buy a Zeiss before the Minox, that's my opinion. I just looked through the two side by side less than an hour ago. The Minox has better contrast on darker objects in low light and the rectical is visible longer than the conquest. Do a web search on comparisons between the two. It's obvious that you would like to think that the Minox is the same as the Conquest, so that you can feel that you can get the same product for less money, but apparently, that isn't the case.Īre you trying to pick a fight with me because I think Zeiss is over priced? The rapid Z is busiest scope on the market. So four hash marks is the same as seven hash marks, just like Minox and Zeiss use the same glass. There are 7 total under the primary crosshair on the Rapid Z 600 but only the ones with 100 yard increments have windage marks as well. The XR-BDC is the same as the rapid z-600, it has 4 hash marks under the cross hair As well, Zeiss and Minox each uses a different set of coatings, so in the end, the lenses are not the same. ![]() As a result, Schott supplies different grades of glass to different customers. ![]() Why is it that some people assume that just because Minox buys their raw glass from Schott, that Minox uses the exact same glass as Zeiss? The manufacturers all supply their glass to meet the standards set by the customer, and all customers do not set the same standards. Squeekįor the money, I'd go for the Minox, same glass as the Zeiss for a couple hundred less. They have a model up from mine that's a 4-14x44 I believe and it wasn't much more than the one I got. The scope is packed full of features and doesn't weigh a ton and you can still use medium height or even low mount rings to keep a slim profile. I found the program to be very accurate as well. 22 or my 7RM or even the 45-70 Govt all I do is go to the Nikon website and use the Spot-On program to find out what my POI will be for each reticle feature and at what magnification. Very very very impressed with this scope (I bought two lol) and if I want to put in on my. The low light performance is outstanding, almost as good as a Ziess but I only paid $529 for my Monarch at Cabelas in Edm. It has a side focus instead of the old type on the big end of the scope so it's super quick to adjust your paralax acc to yardage and goes out to 1000yds so plenty of adj. It has a BDC reticle and with the online software is totally customizable based on your elevation, temp, bullet type & caliber and bullet speed (a few other factors too) to give you multiple aim points on your reticle. I really love my Nikon Monarch 4-12x42mmSF.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |